Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10
Re: Subwoofers
jakeman #184382 11/18/07 02:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
M
manarex Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
M
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
Do these arguments also apply to your primary speakers?


Eric G.
Re: Subwoofers
manarex #184390 11/18/07 03:01 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
Never saw a speaker with a slot port so I wouldn't know.


John
Re: Subwoofers
jakeman #184395 11/18/07 03:12 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
All this talk of ports and angles has me thinking I need to bring out my cylinder head porting and polishing kit to see if I can manage a few more DB out of the EP400\:D


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Subwoofers
jakewash #184399 11/18/07 03:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
M
manarex Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
M
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
By all means, but don't hurt yourself.


Eric G.
Re: Subwoofers
manarex #184414 11/18/07 04:50 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Ah, but remember that the EP400 originally had a port, and Axiom elected to take it out. Presumably there was a reason.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Subwoofers
Ken.C #184451 11/18/07 04:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 853
I believe that given the size of enclosure and the power of the DSP circuitry there wasn't any advantage in terms of output to going all sealed.


John
Re: Subwoofers
jakeman #184454 11/18/07 04:36 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Perhaps there was an advantage in sound quality.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Subwoofers
Ken.C #184458 11/18/07 04:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
M
manarex Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
M
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 84
I agree with John. Given such a 'drastic' change, the speaker would have undergone many rigorous tests, and presumably, the current design reflects superior performance in its present configuration.

Question: Without a port, is the speaker now considered a sealed box? If so, wouldn't it have to have been made larger to obtain the same SPL as the older model?


Eric G.
Re: Subwoofers
manarex #184478 11/18/07 09:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
the ep400 had an older model?


-David
Re: Subwoofers
terzaghi #184485 11/18/07 09:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
There indeed was an earlier version with a port. I believe it wasn't up to Axiom's standards so the port was nixed.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,893
Members15,663
Most Online6,108
Dec 21st, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,852
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,209 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4