Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 40
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 40 |
I had been waiting for this to happen for a few months. Didnt have the budget to buy a dual player, I waited for Sony and Toshiba to figure it out between them. So blu-ray is the winner. Now I am confused which blu-ray player to buy. I am looking for one that is up to date, does not take forever to load DVDs, plays all features of the blu-ray DVDs. but most important for me is to make sure it supports Dolby HD and DTS HD. If someone can help me out with it, that would be great. i am currently looking at Samsung BD-P1400 or Sony BDP-S300/301. Thanks.
M60s, QS8s, VP150 and paradigm Ultracube-12 Samsung BDP-3600, Nintendo Wii
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
I would not get either one that you mention.
The best player out is one of the new Denon’s, but they are mighty proud of them. The next best option is the Panasonic BD 50, but they are not out yet and I’d wait to hear what users have to say about them. Panasonic is having trouble with the LFE track on PCM audio. I’d wait to see if the 50 has the same issue.
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15 |
I would say if your in a hurry go for the Panny 30 as it has pretty good reviews, but as Mike mentioned, it might be smart to wait and see what the 50 brings to the table.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
local
|
local
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 283 |
My vote would be to go for a Panasonic. The Denon's are mighty expensive and the $1200 uses some of the same electronics as the Panasonic BD30 which is half that price. Stay away from Samsung. They're currently being sued.
The Panasonic BD30 is a great machine. It's profile 1.1. The new BD50 will be profile 2.0, but will probably cost more. If on-line content is important to you, wait for the BD50. If not, then the profile 1.1 machine will be just fine.
"Not throwing my hands up or my dress above my ears don't mean I ain't awestruck." Al Swearengen
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
Buy a turntable and a nice tube amp and the hell with the new formats.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102 |
Bayne,
Its not just online content, its the fact that you can download a firmware upgrade just by plugging in your machine to your local network...I think thats worth waiting for IMHO.
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1 |
That's one of the coolest features of the PS3--its wireless connectivity. Within ten minutes of plugging the machine in I had it connected to the internet and downloaded an upgrade.
*********** "Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to buy
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9 |
So far the Panasonics have had almost no updates (last one was April 2007). I just did one Yesterday and (counting the time to download the firmware and burn the CD), it took a huge 6 minutes! I was worried about that too (as I was used to my Toshiba A30's upload capabilities), but it turns out it's even simpler with the BD30! So I would not hold out just for that.
PS: Not that upgrades are not a valid concern; just a lesser one with those panasonic units.
Last edited by EFalardeau; 02/20/08 04:36 PM. Reason: Added the PS...
See Mojo's signature
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to b
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854 |
Timely discussion. I just got a new Denon 3808 and will be setting it up once I get some cables and networking stuff delivered.
With this thing being network-able, I want to take advantage of it's capabilities and also stream music, internet radio, pics, video, DVDs through it and the 58" plasma hanging on the wall. Also need a Blu-Ray player and having the ability to surf the internet with a bluetooth keyboard/mouse is also high on the list of "wants".
Sean mentioned the PS3. I have done an enormous amount of research and this piece of equipment is amazing. It does ALL of the stuff I mentioned above AND is one of the best Blu-Ray players out there (with the ability to take firmware upgrades.
Oh yeah, it is a game console too.
The price is pretty good when you consider the capabilities. Sony apparently has a deal right now where you sign up for a Sony credit card and get $100 off a purchase over $299 and no interest for a year. I'm thinking a new PS3 is going to be on the way soon.
Anybody using the thing for Blu-Ray? Pluses/minuses?
Ray
|
|
|
Re: Now that HD is dead, Which blu-ray player to b
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 436
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 436 |
I use my ps3 for bluray often and no problem so far. Movies play flawlessly and no skips or freezing of any kind.
The cons would be the fact that you have to use the gamepad to control the movie (which is fine by me), or use one of the existing infrared addons so you can control it with a universal remote. The drawback of using this is that only the bluetooth remote/gamepad can turn it on or off, so you would have to manually turn it on or off (there might be some hack that allows you to use it but I'm not sure yet since I didn't research that).
Another con is that it doesn't have analog outs, only toslink/hdmi, and also only allows internal decoding of Dolby TrueHD/DTS HD (not MA as of yet) and passes multichannel PCM to the receiver only (no Dolby or DTS light on your receiver, just PCM).
I guess those 2 can be a real deal breaker for a lot of people, which isn't the case for me.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,890
Members15,663
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
1 members (Hambrabi),
1,436
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|