Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
frequent flier
|
OP
frequent flier
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13 |
Is anybody running the M80's bi-amped with a Denon 3808, and bottom line- do they sound better bi-amped than conventionally? The reason I am asking is because I will be running wires for the fronts through the walls and I only want to do this once. I have been reading about bi-amping and it is reather confusing to me - (more whatts, same amplifier = no more watts, etc. sorry i am a newvie). The speakers have been ordered and I will be ordering the Denon soon so I can't due any testing of my own, but I am runnig all the wiring now and I want to make sure that I can get the most out of these speakers and the receiver. I will be running a 5.1 system.
Thanks all,
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
from what I have heard it is not worth your time/money to bi-amp the m80's
-David
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117 |
It's not worth your time or money to bi-amp any conventional speaker. You will hear no difference at all.
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15 |
Don't worry about BUYamping, as this is not true bi-amping, more like bi-wiring.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Loud, disregard any suggestion in the Denon manual(or any other)that you can actually bi-amp with a receiver that only has one amp with one main power supply section in it. Making the suggested connection simply feeds the same amount of power through two sets of output transistors(one previously unused for back surrounds)rather than one. Available power isn't doubled or increased at all.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 868
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 868 |
I think its wasted effort, out of curiosity I experimented with bi-amping speakers from my reciever and I couldn't hear any difference.
Dave
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117 |
You can indeed connect multiple channels on the 3808 to one pair of speakers. I believe that you can actually connect as many as three channels to the fronts for example by configuring all channels as fronts in the menu. Randy is correct that this doesn't buy anyone anything but the technical explanation is not correct. The receiver, when connected this way, is actually able to provide more power into a single channel. The problem is that the majority of speakers simply cannot use this power (including the 80s). The reason for this is because the maximum voltage of each amplifier cannot be exceeded (ie. fire and smoke). Since all channels are connected in parallel, your receiver's power supply can indeed dump three times the current into each channel but the rail voltage of each channel is not permitted to exceed its rated value. You'd have to find a very, very low impedance speaker to take advantage of the extra current. Having the current doesn't do any good if your amplifier channels experience voltage collapse. The best explanation I can offer as to why this is made available is so that people can double up on front speakers if they wish. Doubling up on fronts lowers the over-all speaker system impedance thereby requiring more current. So, if you want to take advantage of this method, double or triple the number of M80s for the fronts .
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
frequent flier
|
OP
frequent flier
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13 |
Thanks all for your advice. It sounds like bi-amping the 3808 is not worth it. But thinking about this scenario, I am going to run another set of wires for each front. Just in-case one day I have the money to buy separate amps for the fronts or as Mojo says, connecting more M80's to the front. Now... that would be awsome! Imagine two M80's side-by-side or on the top of each other?
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738 |
OK, so that is an interesting idea. Has anyone ever put 4 M80's across the front in a 2 channel config?
Would it sound better, worse, different or the same?
If I had an extra pair of M80's I think I could probably find a different use for them.
And one M80 on top of another, hmmmm, now that would be pretty tippy. Keep the dog, cat, and kids away!!!
paul
Axiom M80, VP180, Qs8, EP500 Epson 3020 Rotel RB-880 Denon AVR-990
|
|
|
Re: Bi-amping M80's with a Denon 3808
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
I think it would probably screw the sound stage and imagining. It would certainly be loud, if the receiver didn't shut down.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,890
Members15,663
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
615
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|