![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
In addition to a moderator, we need to post a large note on the main page:
"Please don't feed the trolls."
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490 |
Uh-oh... Hey, dh, now your initial post is considered a TROLL... (j.k.)
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/wink.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 41
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 41 |
Sushi, As you can see in Technical Questions, I've started another incindiary thread re: soldering end fittings on cables. I believe the first response started out "Jane, You ignorant slut..." Some guy named Dan Acksomething
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236 |
That's TOO funny!
Jane you ignorant slut... hahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 973
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 973 |
"Chickens don't clap."
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041 |
Welcome to AVSHELL ... kidding aside... if there was moderators and such...this wouldn't be the Axiom forum. We should be smart enough to just walk...or just go to the next topic if issues like this pop up.
Anyone start Christmas shopping yet? ... ops wrong forum.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958 |
In reply to:
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE
James Brown?
I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/wink.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 41
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 41 |
Why Sid, I'm flattered... do you think our relationship has attained it's zenith here, however. After all your handle is "sidviscious" and mine is "dharmatone"; you're a heartland boy and I'm a coastal girl....and you are probably not a bruins fan....
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
frequent flier
|
frequent flier
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14 |
Sushi the Wave 8's from ASL retail for $119USD each so a pair is roughly $250. They do use Chinese tubes ( not my favorite) and make about 8 watts in a P-P configuration. To all you stuck in the mud solid state fans you owe it to yourself to audition a tube amp with speakers for which they are intended. Speakers and amps have to compliment one another.
Mike
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: Tube amps vs solid state with todays technology
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,756 Likes: 39
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,756 Likes: 39 |
Hi ProAcFan
The M3s and M22s are very good matches for lower power tube amps.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,958
Posts442,560
Members15,628
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
2,033
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|