Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
The cap size is making me capsize.
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612 |
I finally got Lonnie on the phone and he concurred that the XPA2 and M80s appear to be a mismatch. He states that with the original M80s the crossover did appear to drop below 1.5 ohm at certain frequencies (he didn't specify what testing was done). Lonnie also stated that the the XPA2 does not have a current limiting circuit as does the Rotel, this is an intentional design to allow the xpa2 to express the full dynamic range in an unfettered manner.
The only emotiva amp(s) he would suggest as a consideration to run the M80s would be two XPA1 monoblocks, which are able to go down to a 1.5 ohm load. These will be $999 apiece so the cost would go up quite a bit with that solution.
The sound of the XPA2 with the M80s at high volumes was quite good, however perhaps this is the definitive word regarding their incompatibility at just such high volumes.
"If you try to turn toward it, you go against it."
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
The original M80s croosver was reworked back in 2002-2003 and the newer tests that have been done prove it does not get anywhere near 1.5ohm.
For that kind of money you might as well get the A1400-2 that is now looking like it will be in production soon.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15 |
I'm not trying to doubt Lonnie as I had a lot of conversation with him 3 years ago about the MPS1. But, he had never even heard of Axiom at the time. Even the prior m80's never dipped below 4ohm at any frequency, the Soundstage graphs don't lie. Sounds like an excuse to me. Oh well.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612 |
For that kind of money you might as well get the A1400-2 that is now looking like it will be in production soon. Absolutely, I am just passing along the info for those who had expressed interest in the XPA/M80 pairing question.
"If you try to turn toward it, you go against it."
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612 |
I think the main difference is that now he is acknowledging the incompatibility between the design of his amp(s) and the M80s and not attributing it to setup issues or a defective unit. Also he is happy with his design so we should not expect a change in his future amp designs to improve this situation with regard to the M80s.
Last edited by SatKartr; 11/04/08 09:48 PM.
"If you try to turn toward it, you go against it."
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15 |
Does he understand it is not just m80's. I know people with Rockets having the same problem on other forums.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: XPA 2 Now! A Keeper?
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612 |
I didn't want to press him on that point, I think we are all wise to suspect the veracity of the info about going M80s going below 4 ohms; my goal here was merely to convey/share that the problem has been acknowledged and there are no current plans to improve compatibility on Lonnie's end.
"If you try to turn toward it, you go against it."
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,890
Members15,663
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
1 members (Hambrabi),
1,436
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|