Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361 |
Ditto the sub over new AVR suggestion. A $600 AVR won't change your enjoyment much, unless your current AVR is real crap. But a $600 sub can do wonders, even if you don't wake the neighbors.
Panny 3000 PJ, 118" Carada, Denon 3300, PS3, Axiom QS8, PSB 5T, B&W sub, levitating speaker wire
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
+1 for the sub over new avr. $600 can get you some nice subs from Hsu and SVSound to name 2 companies with good subs in that range. Just don't use it turned up. A sub properly calibrated should not be heard over the mains it should blend in and smooth out the bass response and if the neighbors complain, only use it for movies and invite them over to watch
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 44
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 44 |
Well i do got a 12 inch polk sub i can use along with it if i have too. I mainly wanted a receiver with hdmi cause i ordered a new tv stand. Its the kind were the tv kinda hangs on the back. I have 2 onkyo receivers a TX DS696 and the ht - r540. both are kind of dated now.
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
OK, so you have a sub that works if needed for more boom for HT, then I would get a new avr as well. The Pioneer should work very well.
The VP100 is a great center channel too and should work very well with a set of M50s.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 639
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 639 |
For what it's worth, a few years ago kcarlile, pmbuko and I did an informal shootout between M3's, M50s and M80s. M50s came in last, even after we realized they were wired out of phase. The M3s seemed to have better balance and a bit more bass impact (which was a little baffling considering the difference in cabinet sizes).
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562 |
Adam, Good to see you 'oot and aboot'. Thanks again for the Audition of your M60's. I swear that white maple looked real!
Last edited by davekro; 03/16/09 09:47 PM.
Dave
"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 139
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 139 |
"The M3s seemed to have better balance and a bit more bass impact (which was a little baffling considering the difference in cabinet sizes)." Then, respectfully, your “shootout” could not have been setup properly as there is no way the M3’s have a more extended bottom end than any of the Axiom towers. Further, when you setup the speakers, where they all in approximately the same position or in different positions all together? Where the tweeters all at ear level? (albeit, the latter has no bearing on bass response) I find it amusing, and I write this with a grin, if I were to favourably compare the M60’s or M80’s to exotic European loudspeakers priced at $2500.00 +, most of the people on this forum would have no problem accepting a positive comparison . But if I compare the M50’s to the M60’s/M80’s which are built by the same manufacturer in the same building, using essentially the same drivers, technology and research, people grimace. Sometimes you just have to laugh!!
Those who have long enjoyed such privileges as we enjoy forget in time that men died to win them.
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
A few years back we had a member (NeverHappy) that had both the M80s and the M50s and preferred the M50s over the M80s. Of course he was NeverHappy Seriously he did.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
They were pretty close together; the M3s were on top of the M50s. Now, I don't know that they were precisely level matched, but we all pretty much agreed. Of course, psychologically, the M50s were at a disadvantage because of the phase accident, which is kind of why I hesitated to mention it. I'd have to dig up the thread to know what I really thought, though. Well, that and I still have warm fuzzies for the M50s.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: M50 system help
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 44
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 44 |
Im kinda curious why i never see anyone recommend m2s on here. At one point i was really thinking of just getting 4 of them a VP100 and using my old sub for a cheap system.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,893
Members15,663
|
Most Online6,108 Dec 21st, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
1,209
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|