Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Yeah Ray, audio engineers have known for many years how to make amplifiers which amplify with audible transparency. One of the great things about the modern audio scene is the availability at very modest cost of receivers which are audibly flat from 20Hz-20KHz along with inaudibly low noise and distortion. Nothing audibly better than that is possible, regardless of cost. These days no competently designed unit exhibits a sonic coloration(i.e., a "sound").
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158 |
To get you started. You know how everyone goes on at length about how good the scaling is in Oppo's BDP-83 Blu-ray player? It uses most of the features that Anchor Bay put into the chip which also powers the DVDO Edge. So you could make the DVD output of the PS3 (turn off all scaling and noise reduction features) look as good as the Oppo, and have the same for your cable, and all other sources too. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the Denon 2310CI originally mentioned use this same Anchor Bay scaling chip?
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
Oh yeah, it does. Sorry for the confusion. I was reading Denon's detailed specs wrong. They list two different scaler chips there, but don't have checks next to either. But on the textual description it does say it has the Anchor Bay VRS ABT-2010. So as long as Denon implemented chip correctly, you can pass on the external scaler. Additionally, that ups my vote to putting the Denon with the Pioneer display.
Good catch, thanks.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 153
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 153 |
That definitely seems to be a reason to go ahead and put the Denon in the basement, where I do my real TV viewing. That's what I'll do.
You all are a great resource for those of us who only dabble and can't figure most things out on our own (and I'm sure for those who know a LOT more than I do). A lot of this is hard to understand without a dumbed down explanation. It is very much appreciated.
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
It is that ABT chip in the Denons that has me looking at a new one to replace the 3808
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670 |
Guys, do you know if the 2310 will convert all HDMI inputs to 1080p before sending them to the display? Right now I am letting my projector do the de-interlacing (BD player not included) because I thought the 2310 would only convert analog sources to 1080p and then output over HDMI. I have been looking in the manual and cannot find if it will do it with digital inputs. With my cable box or HD-DVD player, the projector is being fed a 1080i signal, not 1080p. Perhaps the results would be better letting the 2310 de-interlace? Edit: Looks like it can, need to try that tonight
Last edited by Potatohead; 01/28/10 09:38 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 158 |
Yes, I've been looking at upgrading my receiver, as it doesn't handle HDMI of any sorts, and the analog audio work-around for my Blu-ray player throws everything else out of whack. The rave reviews the Oppo player has been getting has made my look at the Denon 2310 since it has the same scaler chip, though I realize that doesn't necessarily mean video performance will be equal to the Oppo's.
Let us know how well the Denon handles the upscaling.
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 153
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 153 |
Just an FYI--according to the AVS website, the Denon 890 is the same as the 2310 in all respects except the following: "1. the 2310CI has a second, Zone 2 remote in addition to the two-sided regular remote 2. the 2310CI adds 'CI' features for integration into automated, custom integrated home systems: an RS-232 port (e.g. for Crestron/AMX 3rd-party control, as well as for loading firmware updates), assignable 12V trigger" Typically the 890 is about US$50 cheaper than the 2310. I ended up with the 2310 only because I found a good sale on it that actually made it a few bucks cheaper than the 890 (which I had purchased but then returned).
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670 |
They look slightly different as well, if that matters to anyone. Small differences though.
Last edited by Potatohead; 01/28/10 11:02 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Sound of Receivers
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 43
buff
|
buff
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 43 |
Yeah Ray, audio engineers have known for many years how to make amplifiers which amplify with audible transparency. One of the great things about the modern audio scene is the availability at very modest cost of receivers which are audibly flat from 20Hz-20KHz along with inaudibly low noise and distortion. Nothing audibly better than that is possible, regardless of cost. These days no competently designed unit exhibits a sonic coloration(i.e., a "sound"). Its refreshing to read this, and to have it supported on an audio forum after years of reading bunk about the sound coloration of what are largely transparent devices. Don't tell anyone, but I'm using auto-electrical cable in my HT... three times the copper and half the price of even bulk "speaker" cable.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
595
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|