Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
He is an amazing guitarist I'm sure he is, but I still haven't heard him do anything that someone as uninformed as I am could appreciate. Also, he has a face that would turn Medusa to stone when he's playing.
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
He is an amazing guitarist I'm sure he is, but I still haven't heard him do anything that someone as uninformed as I am could appreciate. Also, he has a face that would turn Medusa to stone when he's playing. I'll second that nomination.
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 23
hobbyist
|
hobbyist
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 23 |
John Scofield, This meets That. Last night, lights out. You either totally dig, or can't stand, an original like John S. This is one of the best recorded CDs I have heard. If you like over the edge, eclectic jazz, John is worth a listen. Also if your curious what the House of the Rising Sun might sound like on acid, it's on this CD.
Peace,
PB
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 105
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 105 |
Sharp Aquos LC60LE650U/Onkyo TX-NR5010/Axiom M100/Axiom VP150 v2/Axiom EP500 v2/Axiom QS8 v3
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 678
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 678 |
Yo-Yo Ma, Edgar Meyer, and Mark O'Connor - Appalachian Waltz Oscar Peterson Trio - Plus One (with Clark Terry) Art Tatum - Piano Starts Here
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Listened to Hiromi: chou à la crème And to think I use to hate both Jazz and piano now I love both, well except classical piano. Ok no big surprise I’m listening to her again but the coolest part besides her playing it that I got all my food prep/cooking done for the week in the time it took to play her “Beyond Standard” CD. Yup I need to get a life.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
At the risk of appearing less refined, I still fit a bit into your original category. Solo piano continues to be me least favorite, but not necessarily disliked, instrument. I can appreciate amazing piano talent from poor, in multiple genres, but if given the choice between a solo piano CD and any other solo instrument, I'll almost always go with the other.
Piano mixed into a orchestra, jazz group, rock band etc. is a whole other matter. I generally enjoy what it adds as a piece of the bigger puzzle so I'm not sure why it's my least favorite solo item. No need to analyze it I guess, one likes what they like.
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1 |
RE: Analyzing what one likes.
Immanuel Kant spent a very long time with his brain in that very shrubbery maze. Check out "Critique of Judgement." It changed the way I perceive everything. (Sorry, I used to teach "Philosohpies of Aesthetics." Kneejerk sorta thing.)
Always call the place you live a house. When you're old, everyone else will call it a home.
|
|
|
Re: So what are ya listening to tonight?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
Thanks BobKay. I took the time to Google his work at lunch. I managed to find what is most likely an extremely over-condensed, Coles Notes type version of this, his third 'Critique' on subjects that most would find way too "undefinitive " (yes I know that's not a real word) to even take a stab at. I actually got about 3 paragraphs into my thoughts on the bit I could grasp from a quick scan of the above shortened version but I have since deleted them. I realized I hadn't read enough of the real paper to make judgmental statements on his theory of judgments No, they were not necessarily negative judgments either. Although the one thought I will share is that the samples of his interpretations did at times appear to be thoughtful enough to inspire deep though on my part <good> but yet full of terminology that in itself was very open to interpretation. Thus I wondered if perhaps his actual paper was accompanied by a glossary of sorts that hardened up his terminology so it was less interpretational ...or.. was he deliberately using interpretational language to describe his theories so that they were more likely to be accepted by the masses (supports multiple interpretations) or less likely to be refuted. In the end though, it is a stronger effort to explain something unquantifiable than I could have mustered up so it's worth reading and I'll be checking the library to see if I can find the full paper. Humble opinions based on not enough data. Hopefully taken as conversation, not critique.
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,951
Posts442,536
Members15,623
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
527
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|