![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Some power amps are designed with a supply per output device, but others (like the A1400-8) aren't. There's nothing inherently wrong with a design based on a single power supply. But more often than not, the single supply isn't big enough, and dividing it among several output devices isn't ideal. But then some multi-channel amps, use one power supply per channel, but in an effort to squeeze that many transformers in one chassis, they are all under-sized.
It's all about the over-all design, and there are many ways to do it wrong. If this is correct, it makes John's argument merely one of semantics and fairly misleading, at that. I agree with him that biamping in the receiver makes no sense, but not because it's drawing from a single power supply. No, it makes no sense because biamping with ANYTHING not including an outboard crossover doesn't really do anything.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
It's funny, I never read assigned books, or did my home work as a teen (heck, pre-teen). But I was always studying something. All my teachers told my parents the same thing, "Chris could get straight "A"s if he'd just apply himself." The thing was, grades didn't motivate me, an A meant nothing. I'd rather be learning something which interested me. I'd pick up the Math, or English, or whatever as I needed it (to understand my own experiments*, or when writing stories).
*I invented Trigonometry one summer when I was trying to figure out how to programmatically rotate a camera by only using 3D coordinates of it's location, and where it is looking in space.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
Lets break it down how well designed, multi-channel amp with a single power supply differs from a well designed, multi-channel amp with multiple power supplies differ when "bi-amping".
An amp with a single PS can provide X number Watts into any one channel, but divides those Watts between all available channels when more than one is active. If your goal is to put more power into a speaker, it isn't going to happen. You get X/2 Watts at most to each channel when driving two outputs at the same time (so X/2*2 or X).
An amp with multiple PSes can provide X/C Watts into each of it's channels, where X*C is the max it can pull from the outlet. If you bi-amp in this case, you can get X*2 Watts into the speaker.
If you're comparing something like the Axioms A1400-8 and Outlaw's 7700, the numbers work out like this:
A1400-8 driving one channel at max, it's getting 1400 Watts. A1400-8 driving two channels at max, they're each getting 700 Watts for 1400 Watts total. A1400-8 driving seven channels at max, they're each getting 200 Watts for 1400 Watts total.
7700 driving one channel at max, it's getting 200 Watts. 7700 driving two channels at max, they're each getting 200 Watts for 400 Watts total. 7700 driving seven channels at max, they're each getting 200 Watts for 1400 Watts total.
Is that making sense?
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
It makes sense, but it still makes John's argument a red herring.
Also, there's no way a tweeter's going to take 200 watts. It would probably catch fire and melt (hell, a midrange might too), which is my understanding of why bi-amping doesn't double the amount of power to a speaker.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
But when "passive bi-amping", you're still using 200 Watts into both ends of the speaker. When driving the tweet/mid their high-pass filter is turning the low frequency signal to heat, and woofer side the low-pass filter is turning the highs to heat.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
But you're NEVER using 200W! Of course, we're in agreement here...
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845 |
I think, as the unofficial, self-proclaimed, fearless leader of the M60's posse......it's time I chimed in here. You all, are wrong. The term "bi-amping" when used in reference to the M80's, simply means: two amplifiers. One amp for normal use, and the other amp wired in, so when the first amp overheats, or shuts down.....with the flip of an A-B type switch, the second amp takes over, so no listening time is lost. ![whistle whistle](/boards/images/graemlins/default/whistle.gif) M60ti's, M60v2's, and M60v3's, all Rule!
LIFE: "Choices, balance, and timing"
(Larryism)
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789 |
But you're NEVER using 200W! Of course, we're in agreement here... In order to drive our M80's to 80 db's we only need about 1 watt of power. This is what has been explained to me on here, I'm not educated in the math that gives us this figure, so I'm just repeating what I've read. So using the 'water' model from the thread in the 'Technical Questions' forum, I'm picturing the faucet turned on just enough to let 1 watt flow down the pipe to my speaker. Which creates 80db's worth of output, so most people won't be opening that faucet (volume knob) much further than that. However, if you turn the volume knob on your reciever up 100%, then the faucet is wide open, so if it's a 200 watt amp, then wouldn't there be 200 watts worth of power flowing through the pipe to the speaker? If not then how could they call it a 200 watt amp?
My Stuff :
M80's QS8's VP150 EP800 Denon 4802 Emotiva XPA-3 Samsung BD-P3600 Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
I didn't completely understand his statement either. Most people won't use 200W, but it's possible some will.
The 1 Watt figure, isn't really math, it's a measurement. Axiom puts 1 Watt of power into the speaker, holds a mic 1 meter away, and sees how loud it is. It's known as the speaker's sensitivity. The M80s actually get 91 dB from 1 Watt.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: bi-amping with m80s
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
michael_d,
The controlling device is your (stereo or multichannel) preamp--either a separate one or the preamp section inside your AV receiver.
The level control in the preamp meters out the low varying voltage to its pre-outs, depending on the level setting, then to the amplifier inputs. Where you set the "volume" control adjusts the preamp circuitry to send a signal that will vary (with the dynamics of the music signal) from a few millivolts to perhaps 1 volt or more. As JohnK mentioned, most amplifiers have 28 to 30 dB of gain, which means that if the amp section in your outboard power amp or inside your AV receiver is getting a 1-volt input signal, it will be close to delivering its full output to the speakers.
Alan Alan, Thanks, but I’m still confused. When I referred earlier to the sine wave input signal I was referring to what you are, the pre-amp output to the “amp”. The “amp”, whether it is an actual physical device or component in the receiver (amplifier or transistor) or if it is working sum of all components is where my confusion lies. John has stated that a receiver has one power supply and one amplifier. He also states (and so does Chris), that these “transistors” act as gates for current flow to each channel and that share a common “pool” of power which is supplied by the power supply. I need a block diagram. Anyone know where one might reside on the web?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,958
Posts442,560
Members15,628
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
2,139
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|