M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8 |
Hi Folks,
I'm a newbie to this site, but I am a long term audio/HT nut. You all seem pretty friendly and knowledgeable, so...
Has anyone owning the M60s listened to the DM603? I like the controlled and authoritive bass of the B&W, but find the mids slightly "boxy". My listening room is average size, I have a dedicated audio set up already, looking for some quality floorstanders for 60% HT, 40 % tunes. Need speakers with good slam that aren't afraid of some injudicious rock.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
The general consensus of those on the board who have heard the B&W 600 series is that the Axiom M60s are noticeably better -- not to mention cheaper. It's also been said that you need to move up to the B&W 700 series to start getting on par with Axiom performance.
With the M60s, you get the tight controlled bass, crystal clear highs, and smooth accurate midrange without a boxy effect.
If you're looking for big slam, you'd do well to consider adding a subwoofer if you don't already have one.
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8 |
Thanks for the response. I have a sub for my existing HT setup, just have never heard a modestly priced sub (yet!) that really sounds good with music.
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
What sub do you have, and what do you consider "modestly priced?" We often (ok, more like always) recommend SVS and Hsu subs.
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8 |
My HT system has an Energy XLS-8. It is bloody awful sonically. But for my movies, it's adequate.
I would figure $300-400 would be modest for a sub. But if I went that route, I probably wouldn't get towers. Don't want to go much over $1K for the new tranducers.
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Sounds like you're prioritizing your main speakers, which is the right thing to do. Go with the M60s and don't look back.
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951 |
The B&Ws I heard didn't strike me as particularly good, but there are some other speakers out there that I would consider. And, of course, the M60s are truly EXCELLENT and versatile.
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,185
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,185 |
You may want to take a look at this faceoff. I've listened to the Monitor Audio Golds and loved them. But I like the $1k savings of getting M22's.
Audioholics
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 Likes: 1
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 Likes: 1 |
You know, I don't have too much to add here beyond what gets continually recycled on the boards. I love my M60's and am looking forward to adding a good quality sub when I can afford it.
But what drew me in was john's joyful writing. Anybody who uses "injudicious" and "bloody awful" in one thread has a seriously bright future around here. Stay and chat awhile.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: M60 vs B&W DM603S3
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8 |
Mr. Tuttle; you are too kind.
How about "thin-walleted cognescenti" as a handle?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,990
Posts442,736
Members15,646
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
557
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|