Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hi shoeless,
Yes, it should work out very well if you use QS8 surrounds. You might try moving the left rear surround even farther back if that's possible. But the QS8 surrounds don't have to be symmetrically positioned--one can be higher up than the other and one closer if your room setup dictates that arrangement. You can take care of the differing distances in the setup of your AV receiver.
Regards, Alan
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
Also, if you just can't get it to work (or don't hear a noticeable improvement) you could always return the 2 QS8's and stick with 5.1
-David
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 40
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 40 |
Thanks for the responses. Unfortunately, the QS8's are not happening. Im going to angle a pair of M0's from small cavities in between the studs.
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851 Likes: 15 |
Why are the Q's not happening, you won't even come close to the same experience with M0's, or even larger bookshelfs for that matter. You would be better off just going 5.1 with Q's and forget about rears in my opinion.
For whatever reason the Q's are a no go, at least go larger on your inwalls, versus 3" woofers.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181 Likes: 1 |
Shoeless, as Randy said go with the QS8's - you will not be disappointed! Keep in mind you do not have to angle the Q's towards the listening position as you mentioned and have shown in your diagram. Just flush mount them to the wall in the best position your room will allow - generally speaking they do not need to be pointed at the listening position.
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851 Likes: 15 |
At least the Qs4's if budget is an issue, there is always the auction site for additional savings.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769 |
I'm with the others. If it's to put M0s in the back, I would just go with 5.1 with QS8s.
Bruno M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890 ------------------------------------ "The problem is choice..."
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
If the plan is to go with m0's all the way around the space seems a little large for that IMO. If budget is a major issue I would consider Building incrementally (start with fronts, add surrounds, add sub, add center) or something along those lines.
-David
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 set up
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 40
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 40 |
M0's on 5.1 and 7.1 (all built into the walls) and in wall m2's up front. If the speakers are too small, then so be it. Maybe i will change it sometime down the road. I can calibrate the smaller speakers to push more relative to the m2's
Back to the original question. Does the proposed location of the 7.1's fall too far outside the "ideal" location for them to be of any use?
Thanks in advance.
Edit: these are 4 original m0's, not on-walls. That is why they are being hidden in between the studs.
Last edited by shoeless; 07/12/11 03:09 AM.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,990
Posts442,735
Members15,646
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
559
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|