Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: blind testing of speakers
RickF #358374 11/09/11 05:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
J
J. B. Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
J
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
thanks Alan for your answer; and the same to everyone else too who contributed, including the good laughs. :-)

Re: blind testing of speakers
RickF #358375 11/09/11 06:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015


Re: blind testing of speakers
RickF #358376 11/09/11 07:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852
Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852
Likes: 15
Wow, that is a very old pic of Alan, Rick.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: blind testing of speakers
alan #358386 11/10/11 01:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Originally Posted By: alan
Aarrrgh!

Going back to your earlier question, the research shows that in the case of loudness differences of less than 1 dB between two speakers that are NOT detectable by listening (but which are measureable with a broadband pink-noise test signal), the louder of the two speakers will be perceived as sounding "better". I don't recall details of how that was defined.

[pedant]
So, we can hear differences of less than one db, it just doesn't register as louder.
[/pedant]


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: blind testing of speakers
fredk #358394 11/10/11 02:11 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
You got it, Fred. Small differences in sound level which aren't clearly identifiable as such can instead be described as factors such as "stronger bass", "clearer highs", "fantastic imaging", etc. This is particularly noteworthy in components such as amplifiers and players which have no capability to affect those factors when played at matched volume levels.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: blind testing of speakers
fredk #358395 11/10/11 02:17 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 9
Ian Offline
President
connoisseur
Offline
President
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 9
fredk

The perceptibility of loudness, and other differences caused by one being louder than the other, is an interesting test. By simply having the only difference in your double blind listen test between position A and B a difference in dB you can judge the effect of this phenomenon in isolation. When you are 2 dB louder you will get comments referring to the difference in SPL along with other comments about the sound difference which will be favourable for the slightly louder one. As you get down to 1 dB the comments in regards to SPL will start disappearing leaving just the odd comment about minute advantages for the slightly louder one. Once you are down to a ½ dB difference the comments about differences of any nature will disappear. If you can keep your test products within a ¼ dB of each other then you know this variable is out of your results.

For setting up the levels we use IEC 268-5 weighted noise. It is rolled off below 40 Hz and above 5 kHz. You do want a good meter for setting this up too. Though the SPL meter only needs to read a difference between the two products and not any sort of absolute SPL, it does need to be linear and broadband. We use our B&K SPL meter as the benchmark.


Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Re: blind testing of speakers
Ian #358397 11/10/11 02:21 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Ian, thanks for detailing the sound source used for calibrations.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: blind testing of speakers
Ian #358399 11/10/11 02:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Thanks Ian and John. Ian. In my mind, your posts reconciles some of the difference of opinion between different researchers. I believe it was Toole that suggested that you could hear differences as little as 1/2 db. I think it was something quoted by a third party and no explanation was given as to what difference you might hear.

For all that, my M80s sound great at all db levels up to the 'you gonna break your eardrums' setting on my receiver. grin


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: blind testing of speakers
fredk #358424 11/10/11 11:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
Ian, thanks for taking the time to post this. Interesting stuff!


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,889
Members15,663
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,852
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (rrlev), 607 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4