Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Lampshade #366411 02/13/12 01:43 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Good to know, thanks Lampy.


Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366414 02/13/12 02:49 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Yes, Rob; A4L is highly reputable and is a fully authorized Onkyo(and more recently, Denon)dealer. Their offerings are quite popular on the various audio forums. As to factory refurbished, yes my experiences have been entirely satisfactory, to the extent that my attitude now is that I would feel more confident in buying one rather than a brand-new unit, even disregarding any price saving.

Just about any modern unit has the features that you mention. Also, the ones you're considering can all be considered to be fairly similar in maximum power capacity, and the ratings are made pursuant to the FTC(Federal Trade Commission)amplifier power regulations and have to be "honest".

As a practical matter, probably the most significant feature on whatever you get will be the auto-calibration and room equalization system used. Manually using an SPL meter and tape measure isn't likely to match the accuracy in calibration that any of the auto-cal systems achieve(especially with subs)because the element of human error is added. Also, no room equalization can be done with a meter and tape measure, and this is going to be a significant factor in the final sound.

Over the years here preferences in receivers have changed as they've changed. Onkyo and Denon have selected the Audyssey system in preference to their former in-house auto-calibration and room EQ. Primarily for that reason my suggestions have centered on them, with Onkyo being more frequently mentioned because of somewhat better prices being available for similarly-featured units.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366419 02/13/12 03:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
The SC series of PIO amps are different beasts then the usual elite line up, the SC series is much more robust IMO.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366422 02/13/12 03:25 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I thought that the 1121 and the SC-52 were essentially the same?


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Kruncher #366423 02/13/12 03:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Originally Posted By: Kruncher
I've said it before here, but I'll repeat it in this thread as well: I love my Onkyo TX-SR706. Going on three years now, and not one problem...

If I recall, that was the first model year where Onkyo receivers performed well. The previous two models had overheating issues.

Since the SRxx6 models reviews and feed back have been consistently positive.

I was actually eying the 706 when I found a good deal on the 2808.

Its interesting that Pio is making their own class D amp. IMO class D has come of age. There are more and more quality class D amps coming to market.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366433 02/13/12 04:39 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Drr... there is no SC-52... That's the VSX-52. Disregard...


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366438 02/13/12 05:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
Another vote for refurbs. I picked up a refurb HK over 6 years ago, still going strong. Interesting thing about amp design. My HK is rated 70W per channel and my new Onkyo I picked up for our family room is 100W per. The HK probably weights as much as 2 or even 3 of the Onkyo's, heh.

Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366445 02/13/12 06:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
H/K's are notoriously underrated from the factory, IIRC most that have been lab tested usually output around 100W.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366452 02/13/12 08:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,211
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,211
Not many of us H/K owners around anymore I don't believe, I am very happy with mine.


Rick
Our Room

smile
Re: @#&&^! Receiver
Argon #366458 02/13/12 12:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
J
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
J
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
i got a H/K a few months ago; i'm not using the internal amps, but everything else works fine.

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,889
Members15,663
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,852
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (rrlev), 607 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4