Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438487 10/01/20 06:31 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Online Content
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 101
The M2, M3, & M5 differences seems to be a topic discussed quite a bit here. Since I’m ripping everything apart to try the HT on the short wall ... I’ll try and do a quick Listen and see if I can come up with a few comments or perhaps some very unscientific impressions Between the three.

Also Mojo, You always seem a bit conflicted on the M3...like you want to both praise it and diss it at the same time. Like I’ve said before I like the M3 and think as a stand alone bookshelf it’s a great way to go. As surrounds I think they are a Big Bang for the buck (Especially if you can get them on sale). I imagine that the M5s are better And on your recommendation (need for decent bass for surrounds) I’m using them in my bed surrounds. All my heights and tops are M3s.

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Mojo #438489 10/01/20 08:23 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
A
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
A
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
Originally Posted by Mojo
What is it about the atmos signals that you think are better suited to the M2?

Atmos is full spectrum and dynamic range. Perfect for M5 or QS10. The M2 and M3 will distort long before the M5.

You want bass to originate from the intended channel. Strive to assign the sub to the .1 channel. Like me. Moooowaaahaha. Sounds so incredible!


Wait... you went full atmos?

Either the M2 or M3 are ok choices for ceiling channels. I would not go for an M5 due to the highly variable response on its vertical axis. Depending on how you mount them, the seat to seat consistency may be tough to manage.

The best speakers for ceiling use are in-ceiling speakers. The on walls should be used on walls -because of the vertical axis variability. smile Ceiling channels should have the tweeter and driver tilted toward the mlp.

I think the most important factor in ceiling and surround channels is output before distortion as Mojo mentioned. I think rrlev is bang on with his build choice. The bass should be passed off to the subs below 80hz. Not practical to send full range to ceiling speakers for many reasons -mostly enclosure size/weight.

Even high end designs pass off bass to a local sub and not the discrete channel. Just not practical.

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438490 10/01/20 02:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
"Also Mojo, You always seem a bit conflicted on the M3...like you want to both praise it and diss it at the same time."

Regarding the M3, as I have said on its product review page, it offers similar soundstage and imaging as all the other Axioms that have a dedicated mid-range woofer albeit at reduced resolution. The big difference is the lack of that mid-woofer. The 5% of the musical energy that lives in the mid-range band on the majority of songs simply is not as detailed on the M3 as mid-woofer-imbued Axioms.

That lack of detailed mid-range really does conflict me. It conflicts me because there are times when I really like it less detailed. And there are times when I want more detail. It's like I'd love to have a switch on the mid-woofer-imbued Axioms to dial in this mood on a whim.

Rich, I urge you not to line up your M3 and M5 for a listen. You may become as conflicted as I am.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438527 10/02/20 02:44 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Ok so everyone agrees on rear channels then! M2 on walls are the better choice or equally as so the M3 bookshelves? lol

Last edited by Rebulx; 10/02/20 02:46 AM.

Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438528 10/02/20 02:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
Right! M2, M3 and M5 on-walls and bookshelves. smile


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438529 10/02/20 05:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Seriously though, the M2 on walls for my small space should work? Here is a pic on my ceilings. I'm thinking they will blend in my beams for ATMOS plus mid on walls.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438530 10/02/20 05:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
M2s hanging off the rafters and facing your listening area will sound great. You'll need to cut them off at 80 Hz.

Swanky slippers those are. smile


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438532 10/02/20 04:11 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
I love the OW M3's for Atmos surrounds and backs. I also love the round M3 ceiling speakers for overhead duty. Now - when I praise these speakers, I am being specific for their installed and purposeful deployment - ATMOS.

I built some boxes to house the ceiling speakers, then mounted them to my ceiling. You might be able to do something similar in your room. The vaulted ceiling will make overhead speaker placement a challenge - regardless of what you do.

What slippers?

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438533 10/02/20 04:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,515
Likes: 117
The slippers on the feet attached to the legs below the panties. You gotta click on Rebulx's photo, Michael. Unless you are kidding of course. smile

Curious if your OW M3s are wall-mounted or hanging off FMBs from your ceiling.

Last edited by Mojo; 10/02/20 04:14 PM.

House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438534 10/02/20 04:43 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
Oh.... I only got as far as the panties. Had trouble getting further.

My OW M3s are mounted directly to the walls. The room is small, and folks need to squeeze between one of the M3s and the seats. I need to fix that, cause the grill gets knocked off every time I use the HT. I'm too lazy to post pictures at the moment. Maybe later....

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,993
Posts442,752
Members15,648
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,851
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 639 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4