Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 29 of 49 1 2 27 28 29 30 31 48 49
Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439868 11/25/20 05:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 572
Likes: 24
C
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
C
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 572
Likes: 24
Considering trading in the 180 for a 160. If I do that it'll allow me to get the QS10s too. Decisions decisions.


LFR1100
VP180HP
EP600
M3 In Ceiling x 4
M5OW
M2 - Atmos rears
ADA1500.5
M3 Outdoor Speakers
ADA 1000.8
Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439869 11/25/20 05:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
If you don't do it, how will you ever know? You already know you need the QS10s.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M100s?
Canesfan27 #439874 11/26/20 03:24 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Online Content
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by CanesFanInVA
Considering trading in the 180 for a 160. ... Decisions decisions.

The QS10's are excellent ... I have them in a 5.1 setup (w/ M2 fronts, VP150ow center, and EP500) and I have not been wanting as far as sound goes (considering the room and it's function). It's worth stretching a bit.


If the answer to the next question is only a difference of $$ then the decision is easy:
What does the 180 give you that the 160 does not ... and do you need it?
(The reverse is also true ...)

It seems that all the V4 centers are pretty good (although I can't speak for the VP100). I have the 180 and would not hesitate to recommend it. Given the high praise of the 160 by people I trust here I would not hesitate to get that either. The VP150 get's diss'ed here a lot but I'm convinced that's because everyone is referring to pre V4 versions .... the 150V4 on-wall, in the 5.1 setup above, is a fantastic match with the M2's. I'd recommend that as well.

Besides the money, I think the center decision comes down to the size of your screen and the size of the room you want to fill. The 180 is huge and I'm pretty sure you would not want it under a 40" TV. It's an excellent choice for something like a projection screen. The 160 has a vertical requirement to consider.
The 150 in my mind fits visually with most tv's today. IMO the on-wall versions are the way to go if you care about the visual appearance or having any space to place your equipment on. So far, I've been very impressed by the on-wall versions of Axiom speakers ...

1 member likes this: Rebulx
Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439876 11/26/20 03:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
The on-walls are another one of these big secrets. If prospects knew how good they sounded, they'd go for them over floor-standers. But they have less macho man factor and that's important for some.

I'd like to see active LFROW.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M100s?
Mojo #439878 11/26/20 03:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Online Content
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by Mojo
I'd like to see active LFROW.
You'll have to install some virtual walls first ...

Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439879 11/26/20 03:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
In the j-plane. smile


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439880 11/26/20 04:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Online Content
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 102
Actually, it might be possible with M100ow + some combo "reflection" speakers ...
Guess Axiom will have to create it's own surround system.

Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439889 11/27/20 04:23 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
volume...volume... volume... folks.... i'm pretty sure it's why the M2 on walls get such high praise! I've just ordered two from Ian and plan to order at least two more sets after auditioning them. imho, it's all about cabinet volume.


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439894 11/27/20 05:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543
Likes: 117
Rebulx, I don't know if you'll like them. They don't have balsy bass. I suppose you know that from the M2 bookshelves. That's nothing an EP600 can't fix though. And the spectrum on up is clean and involving.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M100s?
Rebulx #439921 11/30/20 06:45 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
I don't expect the M2 on walls to have any bass, at all. Probably will be crossed over at 90-100hz, maybe higher. I hope they will be excellent additions as the upper presence speakers.


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Page 29 of 49 1 2 27 28 29 30 31 48 49

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,890
Members15,663
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,852
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (Hambrabi), 1,436 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4