Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
#448159 12/03/24 05:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 1
T
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
T
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 1
Hi gang,

It's high time for me to upgrade from my ancient, budget-priced, low-quality surrounds --the last remnants of my old Audiosource surround decoder kit, circa early-1990s, before I got my first home theater receiver! My current AV receiver is neither recent nor fancy, a Sony STH-DR540, but it does the job.

Other than my subwoofer, I've had Axiom speakers for the rest of my current home theater set-up for several years now, and am very happy with them. I have two M3 V2 left/right speakers and a VP100 V4 for the center speaker.

Axiom recommends the QS4 for small-to-average rooms and the QS8 for average-to-large rooms, but I'm not quite sure where my room size falls within those generalized descriptions. My theater room is roughly 17 feet by 18 feet. I'm set-up simply for 5.1 Dolby Digital/DTS... no 7.1 nor Dolby Atmos.

I'm guessing either pair of surrounds would work fine, but I wonder if the extra expense of the QS8s would be worth it for my room size, or if I'd be short-changing myself if I went with the somewhat-cheaper QS4s?

Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448160 12/03/24 05:49 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 102
Think this is a how a much your money is worth to you thing … my thinking on the QS series … bigger is better …
I have QS8s and Q10s, can’t speak for the QS4. QS10 is much better IMO. Someone else will have to speak for the QS4 ->QS8 differences … although I seem to recall others saying that the QS8/QS4 were also a jump. Anyway, I’d recommend going bigger and making an offer on the refurb stock you think is reasonable… they will probably still honor the 10% black-Friday discount if you ask for it …

Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448161 12/03/24 07:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
I had QS8v2 and moved to QS10v4 for my 5.1. Huge upgrade.

I also have M5v4OW. I'm enjoying those as my sides. I like them better for music. I sometimes switch back to QS10s for variety.

The advantage of the M5s is that you can use them as fronts if you want in maybe a different room. Or...you can use M5s up front and re-purpose the M3s as sides.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448162 12/03/24 07:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
Given your receiver, my idea of M5s isn't a solid one. The QS10s are a better match.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448163 12/03/24 07:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
BTW, if you like the M3v2, you'd love the M50v4. I run M50v4 exclusively for 2.1 channel music and, at times, just in 2.0. I love them!

Here's another idea. Put your M3s on the sides and get M50s for the front. They're an easy load for any receiver.

https://www.axiomaudio.com/m50-floorstanding-speakers


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448164 12/03/24 07:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
https://www.axiomaudio.com/arb-0306

There's a refurbished M50 in black oak.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448165 12/03/24 08:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 102
Mojo, you sure do know how to zero in on answering the question
I guess I should be more surprised you didn’t suggest adding an EP800 or two to beef up the surrounds … grin

Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448166 12/03/24 08:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
How did you know I'm upgrading from 500s to 800s for my sides?


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448167 12/03/24 09:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 102
Think you’ve been threatening that for years … have you pull’ed the trigger?

Re: QS4 vs QS8 surrounds for my room size?
TooManyMovies #448168 12/03/24 09:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,542
Likes: 117
I've been considering it but the 800s would foul with the M5s when I run my QS15 configuration.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics25,011
Posts442,879
Members15,661
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,852
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 655 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4