Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056 |
Yes - very informative Bren. My Panasonic displays an "I", a "P" or a "B" in the display when paused on a particular frame. I always liked the "I" frames when doing pause-stepping in slow motion to get a clear picture, but never knew why it was better than the other two, or even how it was different.
You should run a seminar. Again. Thanks and very informative.
OT - I had a beta-max when I was a kid. We'd go to Erols (Blockbuster of 12 years ago) and half the store would be in VHS boxes (colored red, with the foam "vampire fang" insert thingy) and the other half was blue, with the smaller beta tapes. There was more selection, I remember, in VHS, and I remember often being upset when I foudn a movie available in VHS that was not available on our precious little outsider - the betamax....
By the way, Bren, what made Beta-max so much better than VHS - and why didn't it catch on....let's see how you handle this one.
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692 |
One word: Marketing.
WhatFurrer
"Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup..."
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
In reply to:
Do/Did you have a Betamax player at home?
No, but we did use one for the security/liability camera at the arena until just recently - it's been replaced by a VHS machine. We did, however own a CED Player when I was a kid.
In reply to:
By the way, Bren, what made Beta-max so much better than VHS - and why didn't it catch on....let's see how you handle this one.
I honestly don't know... besides loading them and watching them, I've had no contact with them. I'm not much of a researcher type, I learn by using, and since I haven't really used them at all, I can't say. I have used Sony's U-Matic, the broadcast format it was derived from - the production company I used to work at had older footage on U-Matic (and 2" quad for that matter).
Sony did shoot themselves in the foot by not allowing others to license the technology, similar to the problem they continue to face (memory stick vs mmc, Atrac3Plus vs WMA vs MP3, etc).
Bren R.
Last edited by BrenR; 06/09/04 01:20 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,501
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,501 |
I believe Sony actually developed or help developed the VHS format, and then they developed the Betamax format. The felt the Betamax was better and kept it for themselves.
More manufacturers made VHS, so it ended up with market share, and bye bye Betamax.
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
JVC takes the credit (blame?) for VHS publically, but maybe Sony had a hand in it?
Bren R.
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 973
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 973 |
my girlfriend works for a TV/Movie Production company in Winnipeg and they still use the Beta broadcast quality formats - Beta SP/SX and Digital Betacam (which I think isn't all that uncommon). It's slightly better quality than VHS because it is a wider tape, but more expensive also (at least that's how she explained it in layman's terms).
"Chickens don't clap."
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
Well, there's nothing to replace the pro Betacam (consumer was Betamax) stuff (SP/SX, Digi)... that's a completely different animal - all ENG is shot on one of the flavours of it, and even the grandpappy analog Betacam is FAR better than VHS or DVD, lemme tell you. That I have a lot of experience with.
Bren R.
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 38
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 38 |
Bren, you said that the dvds we are stuck with now are single sided, single layer discs. Actually most retail DVDs these days are single sided, Double layer discs.
Also, I've read that DVDs now use MPEG4 compression.
|
|
|
Re: Samsung DVDHD841
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
In reply to:
Bren, you said that the dvds we are stuck with now are single sided, single layer discs. Actually most retail DVDs these days are single sided, Double layer discs.
Most of the new blockbusters are dual-layers, I just looked through my collection and ones like X-Men 1.5/Spiderman/Final Fantasy are SSDL, but other older movies (released on DVD) are SSSL. That's almost worse, really... bitrates for the movie itself seem nearly identical, they just pack the 4000 extra minutes of bonus footage/animated menus/easter eggs onto the other half of the capacity and compress at the same bitrate. I admit, some are better than others (tossing the schlock onto a different disc for instance).
In reply to:
Also, I've read that DVDs now use MPEG4 compression.
There are DVD players that play back MPEG4 videos and DiVX encoded video, but consumer DVDs, since they have to be backwards compatible with all players, still carry all video as MPEG2.
Bren R.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,893
Members15,663
|
Most Online6,108 Dec 21st, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
1,209
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|