![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236 |
That's just sick.
The locals say it pretty much happened as Kerry described it, yet John O'Neil says that Kerry shot a sole wounded kid in the back. I'd sue the bas*^% for slander. That's just plain wrong.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951 |
Sorry to interrupt the "John Kerry, War Hero" love fest, but of far more importance today is the testimony he delivered to Congress when he returned - which cannot be disputed. His statements against his fellow soldiers, his lack of support for the 1991 Gulf War (which had almost uniform int'l support), his votes against major weapons systems, his plan to slash the intelligence budget after the first Trade Center bombings, and his recent undermining of the current war effort are far more relevant than whether he earned his medals or not.
That being said, I certainly admire all of our military vets who have put their lives on the line. Maybe if he gets elected I can just keep reminding myself that he is a vet.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 242
local
|
local
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 242 |
In the latest of politician's scare tactics (remember mediscare?), Kerry says a draft is likely under Bush.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 639
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 639 |
Kinda like Cheney saying that if Kerry's elected the terrorists will attack again?
As for the weapons systems Kerry voted against, Cheney voted against many of the same programs.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236 |
Yeah...that's one of my favorites. Weapons programs that CHENEY recommended be scrapped. Too rich.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
I'm just replying here so we can see 3 Kerry voters in a row.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
In reply to:
his recent undermining of the current war effort
Do you think the war would be going better if no Americans criticized it?
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,859
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,859 |
Might as well make it 4 in a row PM
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958 |
I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: OT: Politics
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 342
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 342 |
OK....I gotta throw a large wrench into this dialog. During one of the debates, Cheney made a reference to FactCheck.org (he actually said .com, but it's .org). I made a mental note to myself to go check out that site, but only now have done so.
This site has done one thing very well for me....it has clarfied how full of $hit BOTH candidates are. Everything we have been arguing about (both sides) is based upon mistruths, distortions, & half-truths. This site is not partisan, because it rips apart assertions from both sides. You can spend hours at the site and walk away completely swimming in the head.
I recommend that EVERYONE that has been following this election and this thread take some time to read throught the unending articles debunking assertions made by both sides. As a group, I think that we are much more aware of the issues that the average Joe "sheep" that we talk about. However, after reading this, I realize that we are all still subject to the same types of deceptions.....that we are all guilty of taking the word of politicians, which is a dangerous thing. You'd think that we would have learned better by now.
PS: Please do not respond for us to look at Snopes as Kerry suggested. That site may have some fact analysis, but it's a pathetic hack of a site that bombards w/ popups, which holds no serious credibility. Factcheck, on the other hand, is professionally done and is definitely non-partisan, as they beat up on both sides equally.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,954
Posts442,549
Members15,626
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
1,809
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|