M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6 |
Hi,
I'm currently building a theater room and planning to use a 7.1 setup. Unfortunately due to door's and windows, the left & right SIDE surrounds have to be mounted in the ceiling. I was planning on purchasing the Epic 80 Theater package (5.1) and purchasing a pair of M3's to be placed in the ceiling.
Can someone tell me if this will work, or reccommend a better setup in my case. I'm really not that familiar with axiom products (my friend is) so I leave this question to the experts here to address.
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117 |
Everyone knows how I feel about in-ceiling speakers for home theatre. But, if you must, it may be easier to go with the W series.
Why don't you use QSs and place them ahead or behind of the obstacles?
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
Any possibility of hanging your side surrounds from the ceiling using the Full Metal Ceiling bracket, or some other ceiling bracket? That would allow you to use M3s, or even the incredible QS surrounds, in a more conventional and advantageous manner.
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
M3s are quite large, so you'd better have a really, really thick ceiling if you're going to try that. I'd rather suspend QS8s from the ceiling. You also aren't going to want direct radiators for side surrounds and quadpolar speakers for the rear--that's pretty much opposite of how it should go.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117 |
Quote:
You also aren't going to want direct radiators for side surrounds and quadpolar speakers for the rear--that's pretty much opposite of how it should go.
Now you got me thinking. Maybe I should change my rear QS8s to M3s for better rear effects.
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
Ken, isn't it a given that one would NOT screw the speaker and bracket into something incapable of holding it? I agree that the QS8s are preferable for side surrounds which is why I described them as "incredible."
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
Quote:
Quote:
You also aren't going to want direct radiators for side surrounds and quadpolar speakers for the rear--that's pretty much opposite of how it should go.
Now you got me thinking. Maybe I should change my rear QS8s to M3s for better rear effects.
If you primarily use your rears for HT, I would think the QS8s would be preferable in the rear. I use direct radiators for my rears, and am considering moving them to my bedroom system and replacing them with dipoles that match my side surrounds.
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,543 Likes: 117 |
Quote:
I use direct radiators for my rears, and am considering moving them to my bedroom system and replacing them with dipoles that match my side surrounds.
Why? What are you unhappy about?
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,852 Likes: 15 |
Some people use direct radiating in the rears for music reasons. However, for HT use the Q's will still perform better. Actually, I think my 4 Q's do great for music as well, pretty much wraps you in the sound.
I'm also not a fan of "in-ceiling" speakers for left/right surrounds or rears. It basically goes against the whole purpose of how those channels are to be experienced.
I would try to ceiling mount some Q's either with a DIY method or Axiom bracket. They will not block the windows that much and if you get the right color to match your room decor, they will compliment your room.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: M3's and in-ceiling mounting ?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Oh, my feeling was just that if you're going to have both direct radiators and multipolar speakers in your setup, it makes more sense to put the multipolars on the sides than the back. If you're going to have multipolars all around, more power to you.
Jack, my comment wasn't directed at your post. If he's trying to stick M3s in the ceiling, it had better be one thick ceiling so that they don't stick out the floor above!
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,015
Posts442,890
Members15,663
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
1 members (Hambrabi),
696
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|